Events prior to litigation by Anna_I

Transcript - Guardianship Board Hearing (pdf 20 pages)

The above transcript of the 26 Aug 2004 Guardianship Hearing contains hard black and white evidence given by witness Stan Itsines, who reluctantly, on pages 8, 9 and 10, provided detailed evidence, previously withheld, that all of Erini's properties in Greece were fully secure against squatters.

Stan_I disclosed the details of the anti-squatter security in order to ensure that my application to be administrator of my mother's Greek estate failed. The Guardianship Board and the Public Trustee were satisfied by Stan's assurances that the properties were fully protected, and as a consequence my application was rejected.

In 2006, 6 months after my mother died, a secret squatter lawsuit was lodged against the most expensive property, property title number 671.

The Executrix, Anna_I and silent Executor Gary_S, had planned stall submission of probate to Greece until after the property 671 was illegally acquired via a routine squatter lawsuit lodged by an associate.

They managed to achieve the impossible, to obtain the support of the Public Trustee, their lawyers T&T, the probate registrar and the Supreme Court. to prevent at all costs the mandatory submission of probate to Greece.

It is therefore beyond any reasonable doubt that Stan_I and Anna_I had organised, by deceiving the 'squatter' into believing I was not the inheritor, to sell my inheritance to the squatter claimant via and under-the-counter cash deal in return for not contesting the blatantly concocted lawsuit.

They should therefore now voluntarily confess or otherwise confess under police interrogation to their property fraud. This will cause the lawsuit to be rejected because the lawsuit claim will be deemed fraudulent by way of the confessions by Stan_I, Anna_I, Gary_S..

Guardianship Board - Statement of Reasons (pdf)

The Boards 'Statement of Reasons' is flawed as they are based on prejudicial statements given to the Board in private by the plaintiff without my knowledge and these statements were NOT presented at the hearing of 26 Aug 2004.. The prejudice of the Guardianship Board and the District Court resulted in them making decisions detrimental to the protection of the estate.

Fraudulent Statement - contained in Statement of Reasons
This was made by plaintiff to the Guardianship Board in secret. You will not find this mentioned anywhere in 26 Aug 2004 Hearing transcript.

Nor is the secret letter received by Guardianship Board from Public Trustee condemning the Will mentioned anywhere in 26 Aug hearing transcript.

Nor is the secret letter sent by the Public Trustee sent to the plaintiff promising her I would not become administrator mentioned in 26 Aug transcript..

Absolute power corrupts absolutely. I could have coined that.

Submission to District Court by Philip S (html)

Submission to District Court by Philip S (pdf)
Attachments to Submission to District Court (pdf)
Attachments - Transcript - Guardianship Board Hearing (pdf 20 pages)

This document exposes Anna's deep personal resentment of the will, and the perparedness of my 4 daughters to oppose here.

When Varga read this document from cover to cover on 13 Feb 2007, both she and the Executor knew they had to manipulate their spurious summons to exclude my 4 daughters as defendants. This proves beyond doubt that Varga and Anna had never acted in the Estate's interests, and 99% of their activities were blantant non-testamentary shenanigans focused only on obtaining a share of my inheritance for Anna and Gary.

This is ok to do if they engage their own solicitor as 'challengers', but they never sought to do this because as this damaging document shows they Anna and Gary did not stand a chance against the claims by Anne-Marie, Nicole, Irene and Sonja.

Anna and Gary were fully acquianted with this document because they had read it before entering the District Hearing Court Room.

Apparently the Judge had never even seee it. He had already made up his mind before the hearing had begun.

Transcript - District Court Hearing (html)
Transcript - District Court Hearing (pdf)
Evidence that plaintiff had no motives to behave or carry out duties of an executor, but act purely as a personal challenger.

Also obvious the Judge has been influenced because he is blind to all reason conveyed in my statements.

2004_12_15_Public Trustee has no objection to police action

When I subsequently lodged a statement to police on 7 Jul 2005, the Public Trustee crown solicitor (LM) saw that it would undo her efforts to assist non-beneficiaries with their covert mission to defraud me of my inheritance. She successfully urged the police not to investigate. The police had indicated me prior to that that they would investigate because the accused fulfilled the criteria of motive.

Statement to SA Fraud Squad

Evidence of fraud by plaintiff

4 Aug 2006

2006-08-04 Email with letter - Varga to Philip Stilianos 0804

This document will be used to prove Varga's incompetance and negligence with regard to Section 43 of the Guardianship Act.

Neither Varga nor Anna wanted to seek protection of the minor's inheritance. Their prime aim was to consume it, and unfortunately the Public Trustee participated in this act of betrayal.

Therefor Neither Anna nor Varga acted in the Estate's interests, and their non-testamentary activities prove they were focused solely on undermining my inheritance for the personal gain of Anna and Gary.

email to TT - probate meddling.pdf

allegation proved to be correct.
ACP doc. Solicitor misconduct doc.

Executors and Executrix husband initiate squatter property fraud in Greece in cooperation with their associates in the village and Rhodes.
This is a secret operation concealed from the Australian judiciary, who had been comprehensively duped into giving their full support to the rogue Executors.

A lawsuit is lodged by the planted 'squatter' on 14 Sep 2006 at the Rhodes Court, to acquire beachfront property no 671 in Lahania village (my inheritance).

Just days later probate is granted by SA Supreme Court to the Executors to administer the estate, but the probate illegally excludes property no 671, which the Executors are attempting to sell illegally to a 'squatter'.

2006_10_24_Undisclosed Probate Properties.pdf

Note: this incriminating crucial document was not presented in any affidavit by Varga, but I included it in my affidavit of 22 May 2007. It demonstrates incompetence, negligence and has inferences of collusion with persons facilitating this unworkable probate administration.

Why, if they had doubts about the Will as expressed in their letter, did they avoid applying Sect 69 of Admin and Probate Act 1993. See Sect 69 Avoidance

Solicitor misconduct doc
It just does not make any legal sense whatsoever for them to have obtained grant of probate and then do nothing because they were not sure what to do with the 90% of the testator's properties they had illegally excluded from probate without authorisation of the Supreme Court as required by Rule 206 of Supreme Court Rules 2007 or Section 69 of Admin and Probate Act.

fax 2006-10-27 request for probate exemplification.pdf
Note: this crucial document has not been presented to the Court by the Registrar. refuses to issue probate exemplification.
ACP doc. Solicitor misconduct doc.

2007-02-26 Probate Registrar seeks to block probate issue to Greece

Nicole Vlahos, granddaughter of Erinin, has been comprehensively deceived

2007-01-09 Nickys Statement and Misleading Response

fax 2007-01-30 to varga re anna probate.pdf
her solicitor phones me and says Executor refuses to submit probate. solicitor admits that there has been no estate protection or administration.

Solicitor misconduct doc.

Varga said she would check with Probate Registrar to seek if this was ok.
HUH? Why is the registrar involved with this?

ACP doc Solicitor misconduct doc.

13 Feb
2007

The accounts of T&T show Varga received, on 13 Feb 2007, the following document: Submission to District Court by Philip (pdf)

Varga read it from cover to cover, and she must have frozen at the adverse impact it had on their litigation. No action was taken on the document. Who supplied her with the document. What did she do with it?

Email to TT - negligence in undermining will.pdf

proved to be correct.
Solicitor misconduct doc.

Wrongful Litigation by Executors/Supreme Court

Supreme Court Action Number 192/2007

Affidavit of Anna Maria Itsines.pdf
Exhibits.pdf
Summons.pdf

List of Exhibits AMI 1 to 9 in Exhibits.pdf. The Exhibits are bookmarked in exhibits.pdf and page numbered for easier location and navigation.

Email from T&T with following attachments:
Affidavit_of_Vanessa_Anita_Varga.pdf
Exhibits to Affidavit of VAV.pdf
Amended Summons.pdf
Transcript_of_hearing_0221.pdf
L from Niki 0221.pdf
L Philip 0222.pdf

Proof that Barrister and/or Trealor & Treloar concealed from Judge the advice given by  Greece that would have stopped court action.

Solicitor misconduct doc

Transcript_of_hearing_0221.pdf

mal-hearing
Solicitor misconduct doc.

INJUNCTION - amended.pdf

This, and the affidavit and  hearings, is now seen as the attempt to prevent my uncovering the Executors' squatter fraud.
This was submitted 15 Feb 2007 without my knowledge.

E from Niki 0222
I had only just discovered this one on 4 July 2008. It clearly proves I am the sole beneficiary and that the issue of separation of properties is CLOSED AND FINISHED.
Unfortunately Varga concealed this from the Court because she was acting aggressively for the personal pursuits of the 'Executor-cum-plaintiff' and NEVER for the estates interests.

Outline of Argument.pdf

This document by T&T is at odds with their finding, in their document L Philip 0222.pdf . They received advice that under Greek law that all the property forms part of the residuary estate. Yet just 4 days later at the 26 Feb 2007 at the main hearing, the Judge is comprehensively deceived into believing otherwise.

See 2007-02-26 Deceiving the Judge.pdf

Transcript_0226.pdf

mal-hearing
Solicitor misconduct doc.

Transcript_0226.pdf

In the transcript of this absurd hearing let's undo the barrister's unsubstantiated crap:
- he says I was racing off to greece carrying a bunch of titles in my possession to get the titles transferred to my name.

1. I had no titles with me. Why would I need them? The executors had all the titles of interest. In any case, as in Australia, one does not need physical titles to transfer titles.
2. The fastest way to transfer titles is to stay in Australia and get a lawyer in Greece to do them. In Greece title transfers can only be done via lawyers. You'd be an idiot to go to Greece just to transfer land titles.
3. So therefore the only reason one would need to go to Greece is to see ones properties, to get some appreciation of the market values, and to PROTECT properties against squatters.
4. I had never been to Greece so I had every reason to do this trip, 6 years overdue.
5. One then returns to Australia knowing that the trip has been useful hopefully securing some of the properties and obtaining an idea of what the current market values might be.

Why then stop me from protecting the properties?

It's clear well beyond the shadow of doubt that their plan to fraudulent acquire my Property 671 via squatters was at risk by my attempts to protect it.

The Judge effectively issued an order for the Registrar not to allow me to submit probate to Greece.*

If one knows anything about squatter-prone land in Greece that has to be one of the most absurd decisions in Australia's legal history.

Probate Registrar improperly gets his way
ACP doc. Solicitor misconduct doc

*The solicitor deliberately mislead the Court by not revealing to the Judge that they had just received advice from Greece that their litigation would fail because under Greek law I was the sole beneficiary of the land in Greece.

Instead of ceasing the hearing and getting an immediate order to submit probate to Greece, the Judge and Registrar were fully conned by the barrister and solicitor and the plaintiffs to believing there was still a contest.

They also amended the summons moments before the hearing in an attempt to pass on their costs to the estate.

This is serious misconduct by Wills and Estates solicitor.

L_from_JS_Roder_0306.pdf

Confession of defeat by Executor's barrister.
plaintiff loses. wants to resign.
Roder is the plaintiff's lawyer. He is not a judge and his report style tricks many unaccustomed to legal shenanigans into believing he is a judge delivering 'his' court orders. This report contains a lot of material that I reject. The only part he got right is that I am indeed the sole beneficiary of my mother's overseas estate.
include in Solicitor misconduct doc

SQUATTER LAWSUIT INVESTIGATION IMPLICATES EXECUTORS
Wrongful litigation was devised by the Executors as a ruse to stall submitting probate to Greece in order for the Executors' squatter fraud to succeed

Rhodes Court Action Number 378T/2006 Lodged 14 Sep 2006

The 'executors' went silent, contributed no effort and were shattered that their risky plans had gone awry.

Email - Squatter lawsuit withdrawn.pdf

Executors implicated in squatter fraud

Affidavit of VAV (9) 0504 - Executor Gary wants out.pdf

Disgraced Executor Gary wants out

Squatter lawsuit defeated. Executors implicated.

At the Rhodes Court in Greece the lawsuit is withdrawn by the 'squatter'.

Affidavit of Anna Itsines (2).pdf
Exhibits 1-3 of Affidavit AMI (2).pdf
Exhibits 4-11 of Affidavit AMI (2).pdf

Disgraced Executor seeks to escape liability by fabricating a false affidavit. The self-proclaimed confident heroes, the Public Trustee, Probate Registrar, Treloar & Treloar , are now in full damage control.

List of Exhibits in Exhibits 1-3 and 4-11 of Affidavit AMI.pdf:

Affidavit VAV (10) 0521.pdf

Confessional 'affidavit' by resigning Executor Gary declaring his value to the community

Defeating the Plaintiff

Affidavit of Philip Stilianos.pdf
Exhibits 1 to 5 of 16 of Affidavit of Philip Stilianos.pdf
Exhibits 6 to 10 of 16 of Affidavit of Philip Stilianos.pdf
Exhibits 11 to 16 of 16 of Affidavit of Philip Stilianos.pdf

Typos in affidavit:
- Numbering overlap - clauses are numbered 1-28, then 20-46, so there is an overlap of clauses 20 to 28. This won't be changed, however.
- In 'first' clause 24 ,"8 Aug 2007" should read "8 Aug 2006"
- In 'second' clause 27, change "Greece does look for reasons" to "Greece does not look for reasons"

Comprehensively routing the litigants and their negligent supporters.

I will place all typos in a separate document and prepend to affidavit.

Order 0523.pdf

Executor Anna 'suspended'

letter to SA government on probate mishandling.pdf

Ministerial investigation launched

Email 18 Jul 2007 from Public Trustee.pdf

This is a peculiar statement from Public Trustee.

Court Order - Final - ap14586

Court order goes against plaintiff. No cost order, so plaintiff to pay her own costs.

Unauthorised Building Activity on Property 671

Public Trustee in no hurry to deal with this urgent matter.

Request to View Letters of Administration

Public Trustee rumoured to be attempting to pay its accomplice in attempting to stop my inheritance.

Response confirms this.

Notice of Inquiry by Anti-Corruption Police

Public trustee notified of their role in proactively supporting non-beneficiaries and opposing beneficiary.

Email to Salamastrakis - Withdraw Property Lawsuit on Lahania Property 671

PT intrudes and instructs SAPOL to withdraw investigation

Accounts submitted by T&T to Public Trustee

2008-05-22 Accounts - PT Cover Letter (pdf 1 page)
2008-05-22 Accounts Submitted by TT to PT (pdf 25 pages)

Lawyer instructs Anna on how to do a routine 'fraudulent' title transfer in Greece.

hiotaki - lawsuit prearrangement exposed_english
hiotaki - lawsuit prearrangement exposed_greek_email